Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 22:04:13 GMT -6
The next goal of scientists is to catch spammerThe fight against extremism goes beyond the legal field The FSB offered to give the Russian law enforcement agencies the opportunity to close extremist Internet sites within three days. In the amendments to the current law "On information, informatization and was added to the law, which explains why the expansion of the authorities' powers is needed: "Certain mass media, both printed and electronic,protection of information", proposed by the department, it is said that Internet providers should be obliged to suspend the domain according to a letter from the prosecutor's office. The domain can be blocked for a period of no more than a month, after which, if the case of extremism has been closed or the court has recognized the content of the site as legal, access to it must be restored. Oleksandr Cherkasov, a member of the board of "Memorial",
Ponders what such censorship entail why France Phone Number are the FSB amendments dangerous? - There is a fundamentally important point in the proposed amendments: in fact, extrajudicial repression is proposed. Then, what is characteristic, this latest initiative of the FSB is included in a number of similar previous initiatives. I am referring to the high-profile bill on expanding the powers of the FSB, adopted by the State Duma in the first reading, according to which the special service gets the right to issue official warnings to people who, according to operational information, are engaged in extremist activities. (Let us add that an explanatory note was added to the law, which explains why the expansion of the authorities' powers is needed: "Certain mass media, both printed and electronic, openly contribute to the formation of negative processes in the spiritual sphere, the establishment of the cult of individualism and violence, disbelief in the ability of the state to protect its citizens, actually involving young people in extremist activities ").
A warning is also an action that lies outside the Criminal Procedure Code. "SP": - What does this say? - I think there are reasons to talk about a single process that takes a number of situations out of the legal field. In the court process, the party against whom accusations are brought is somehow protected, it is provided with some rights. In the case of blocking sites by court - if it is, indeed, a competitive process - representation of the interests of the party against whom the state has claims is ensured. But in the case of extra-procedural actions, there can be no question of protecting rights. The tendency to transfer problems from the judicial field to the extrajudicial, from the investigative to the operational, from the regulated to the unregulated, creates prerequisites for the implementation of arbitrary actions that cannot be appealed. "SP": - Let's consider an example. Suppose the site receives a piece of paper from the prosecutor's office, which says that it is being blocked. The trial continues for a month, and the court, admittedly, comes to the conclusion that the site is not extremist.
Ponders what such censorship entail why France Phone Number are the FSB amendments dangerous? - There is a fundamentally important point in the proposed amendments: in fact, extrajudicial repression is proposed. Then, what is characteristic, this latest initiative of the FSB is included in a number of similar previous initiatives. I am referring to the high-profile bill on expanding the powers of the FSB, adopted by the State Duma in the first reading, according to which the special service gets the right to issue official warnings to people who, according to operational information, are engaged in extremist activities. (Let us add that an explanatory note was added to the law, which explains why the expansion of the authorities' powers is needed: "Certain mass media, both printed and electronic, openly contribute to the formation of negative processes in the spiritual sphere, the establishment of the cult of individualism and violence, disbelief in the ability of the state to protect its citizens, actually involving young people in extremist activities ").
A warning is also an action that lies outside the Criminal Procedure Code. "SP": - What does this say? - I think there are reasons to talk about a single process that takes a number of situations out of the legal field. In the court process, the party against whom accusations are brought is somehow protected, it is provided with some rights. In the case of blocking sites by court - if it is, indeed, a competitive process - representation of the interests of the party against whom the state has claims is ensured. But in the case of extra-procedural actions, there can be no question of protecting rights. The tendency to transfer problems from the judicial field to the extrajudicial, from the investigative to the operational, from the regulated to the unregulated, creates prerequisites for the implementation of arbitrary actions that cannot be appealed. "SP": - Let's consider an example. Suppose the site receives a piece of paper from the prosecutor's office, which says that it is being blocked. The trial continues for a month, and the court, admittedly, comes to the conclusion that the site is not extremist.
